Re: MobileOK scheme

+1

That matches my understanding absolutely.

Thanks Jo.

Phil.

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:32:38 +0200, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote:
> 
>> New Proposed New text (with added oomph):
>>
>> " The DDC is thus not a target to aspire to, it merely sets a base 
>> line below which content providers do not need to provide their 
>> content. It is Best Practice [CAPABILITIES][2]  for content providers, 
>> as well as targetting DDC level devices, also to provide experiences 
>> for more advanced mobile devices that have capabilities not supported 
>> by the DDC."
>>
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/#CAPABILITIES
>>
>> Objections?
>>
>> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Adopt above text for clarification that advanced 
>> experiences for non DDC devices do not disqualify sites from achieving 
>> mobileOK, and indeed this is what we'd like them to do.
> 
> I like it.
> 
> cheers
>