Tom Hume wrote: > > > I just gave you an example of a case where degrading HTTPS would be OK > from the content providers POV. I can *guarantee* you it exists - I > was that content provider. If there's one, there's probably others. > And I'm not saying this means it's OK to routinely degrade security... so, if you agree that degrading security routinely is not OK, just say it, request that CTG demands that HTTPS links are not rewritten and let's stop this this discussion in which, what is left, is transcoder vendors' interests against the rest of the world. Opt-in whitelists for websites can be discussed in a new separated thread. LucaReceived on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 23:41:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 20 January 2009 23:41:10 GMT