- From: Luca Passani <passani@eunet.no>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:28:46 +0100
- To: MWI BPWG Public <public-bpwg@w3.org>
No. Those cases do not exist. I don't think that solving a problem that still does not exist and probably never will deserves any of my time. What keeps me here is just checking that W3C does not demolish the foundations of the web. Luca Tom Hume wrote: > > On 20 Jan 2009, at 22:54, Luca Passani wrote: > >> wrt Whitelist, this is a problem for transcoder vendors to solve. >> They may decide to create a common sire where companies can authorize >> all transcoders to break their HTTPS logins in one fell swoop. > > Is there nothing we can do about this, particularly if it's in the > interest of content providers? > >> Anyway, the fact that one content provider approves that one >> transcoder breaks HTTPS on its site, does not mean that the same >> content provider is OK with all transcoders breaking HTTPS on its site. > > > I completely agree; in fact I think I pointed that out :) But it does > mean that such cases exist. >
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 23:29:26 UTC