Re: [minutes] Tuesday 13 January 2009

It's really quite simple simple. You keep saying "CT always rules  
against developers". This isn't true. If it was, I'd have noticed and  
would be complaining.

I've given you a couple of very specific examples which demonstrate  
this is not the case. Let me know if you'd like some more, and I'll  
look through the minutes for you; and in the mean time, please  
consider refraining from undermining the efforts of those prepared to  
be a little more constructive than yourself.

On 14 Jan 2009, at 17:46, Luca Passani wrote:

> What do you want to prove with this? . Yes, CTG has worked around  
> the fact that WML is broken by "no-transcode" and yes this was  
> suggested by developers, but this does not mean that CTWG has  
> consistently  ruled against content owners in 99% of the cases, not  
> coincidentally you keep referring from this same thing over and over  
> again.

--
Future Platforms Ltd
e: Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com
t: +44 (0) 1273 819038
m: +44 (0) 7971 781422
company: www.futureplatforms.com
personal: tomhume.org