- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:36:10 +0200
- To: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Hi,
The minutes of today's call are available at:
http://www.w3.org/2009/04/07-bpwg-minutes.html
... and copied as text below.
Short call. Resolutions:
- We don't know quite how much time we will need, or what we will be
doing so we will review charter extension in May
- Review when to hold final F2F at same time as reviewing request for
charter extension
Francois.
-----
07 Apr 2009
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Apr/0005.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2009/04/07-bpwg-irc
Attendees
Present
adam, francois, jo, tomhume, yeliz, DKA, Kai, DavidStorey,
miguel, rob, SeanP, nacho_on_IRC
Regrets
alanc, manrique, SangwhanMoon
Chair
jo
Scribe
adam
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Review of F2F
2. [6]Working Group Extension
3. [7]F2F in November.
4. [8]BP1.5 status.
5. [9]BP2 status.
6. [10]MobileOK Scheme Status
7. [11]CT Status
8. [12]AOB
* [13]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
Review of F2F
<jo> [14]Minutes - day 1
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Mar/0173.html
<jo> [15]Minutes - day 2
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Mar/0174.html
<jo> [16]Minutes - day 3
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Mar/0176.html
francois: we should discuss schedule for next working draft of
MWABP.
francois: Day 2, CT. I have been actioned to investigate test suite
to test conformance to same origin policy. Will send a mail before
the end of this week to follow up.
... On topic of HTTPS, continued to agree to disagree. Resolution
taken that there is no way to transform https content except
rewriting links, but it is strongly discouraged.
... Day 3, Korean MobileOK trial.
... Gap analysis between MobileOK BP and Korean market presented. We
passed resolution to accept regional variations of MobileOK.
... On relationship on WCAG and BP, working group endorses this
document and is waiting for final approval to publish.
Working Group Extension
jo: We won't complete our work by June, so we need to request an
extension if we want to continue work. This needs a resolution.
francois: We still have a little time so long as we are only
extending the deadline. We should wait to see where we are at and
request only the months we are going to need and not more. The
process should be fast enough to make this request end of May.
<jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: We don't know quite how much time we will
need, or what we will be doing so we will review charter extension
in May
<tomhume> +1
<Kai> +1
<EdC> +1
<francois> +1
<rob> +1
<SeanP> +1
dka: I wonder what work we will actually be doing during this
extension. Will we really be doing WG work or simply shepherding the
final stages of the document. In which case would rather avoid the
additional f2f meeting.
<yeliz> +1
+1
RESOLUTION: We don't know quite how much time we will need, or what
we will be doing so we will review charter extension in May
F2F in November.
jo: Poll indicated that West coast is not favourite location.
<jo> [17]Poll on Nov F2F
[17] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/37584/tpac2009/results
francois: Have responded to cross WG questionnaire with expected
participants = 12, but we expect to be finished by then in which
case we won't attend.
<jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Review when to hold final F2F at same time
as reviewing request for charter extension
<EdC> +1
RESOLUTION: Review when to hold final F2F at same time as reviewing
request for charter extension
BP1.5 status.
<jo> [18]Live edited document
[18] http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=d2vmqg3_0c469pzdh&hl=en_GB
<francois> [19]Minutes of editorial meeting on BP1.5
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Apr/0004.html
Kai: We had an editorial meeting and made a number of changes.
Waiting final touch of word-smithing and to make document styles
coherent.
jo: Some outstanding questions about collapsing sections or removing
some sections that don't work. In this final iteration we may move
things around a little, but lets see how that goes.
Kai: There is one more editorial session to agree on.
<EdC> Is it to be completed before or after the MWBP?
jo: MWABP and BP1.5 is asynchronous -- there is no dependency.
BP2 status.
adam: Haven't had chance to act on changes from F2F yet, will do so
this week. We can decide based on this new draft whether we are
ready to make another public draft.
MobileOK Scheme Status
jo: Having had discussion with Rigo, we are ready to make final
changes to document. Jo will work on this over next couple of weeks,
hopefully done by May.
CT Status
<jo> [20]Open Issues and Actions on CT
[20] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/products/12
<jo> Issue-285?
<trackbot> ISSUE-285 -- Does BPWG feel it can write Best Practices
on links rewriting in the CT guidelines? Or that it cannot be a best
practice? -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[21]http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/285
[21] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/285
<jo> ACTION-925?
<trackbot> ACTION-925 -- François Daoust to ascertain the
availability of tests that ensure that same origin policy
conformance, when implemented in this way, can be tested -- due
2009-04-02 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[22]http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/925
[22] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/925
jo: This issue is still open, awaiting Francois' ACTION: 925
<jo> ACTION-929?
<trackbot> ACTION-929 -- Eduardo Casais to write an abstract for CT.
-- due 2009-04-02 -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[23]http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/929
[23] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/929
jo: Some editorial actions on me, still in progress. ACTION-929 on
Eduardo.
EdC: Still to be done.
jo: The rest are probably on me.
francois: Two actions on me. Registration of x- headers, not
blocking draft. Same origin tests is blocking.
<jo> ISSUE-295?
<trackbot> ISSUE-295 -- It is impossible to reconcile pragmatism and
expediency with good practice -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[24]http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/295
[24] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/295
jo: ISSUE-295, do we want to keep this in, in the light of continued
discussions?
... We should just close it.
<SeanP> Close it.
<jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-295 as we are unable to do
anything about it
<EdC> +1
<tomhume> 0
<jo> +1
<SeanP> +1
<tomhume> was suggesting (frivolously)... that keeping this open as
a reminder to us and others might be helpful
<tomhume> seeing as it's kinda core to the problems we're having
jo: Okay, lets leave it for now.
francois: Should review all the last-call comments to extract from
the list the things that need editing. Need final draft before we
send responses.
<jo> ACTION: Daoust to review last call comments on CT to see where
the responses need editing [recorded in
[25]http://www.w3.org/2009/04/07-bpwg-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-956 - Review last call comments on CT to
see where the responses need editing [on François Daoust - due
2009-04-14].
AOB
jo: nothing further. until next week.
<tomhume> bye all
<nacho> bye all... have a nice easter
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Daoust to review last call comments on CT to see where
the responses need editing [recorded in
[26]http://www.w3.org/2009/04/07-bpwg-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:36:50 UTC