RE: ACTION-837 - Provide explanatory text for the addendum...ISSUE-272 a new name ISSUE-273 for which document? ISSUE-274 which textsare needed?

Hi Manrique,

Jo did already cover your points and I agree with him.
Unfortunately you did come into this group rather late and so you missed
out on the many and lengthy discussions we have had on many of the
points you have made.
Jo's answers summarize this rather well. 


> I would like to remember that sometime ago, some comments 
> were made about the tests themselves and it seems that none 
> of that comments were discussed or taken into consideration:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-pro/2008Jun/0005.html
> 
> That's what I've tried...

And your input was extremely valuable.
There were questions, which I hope had been answered over the course of
time, especially because some were similiar to those here in that they
had been discussed in the group long ago.
Some of your input was cautionary, which was taken into account.
For some I made a decision as editor one way or the other.
...

I don't remember the details, but if you feel that substantial changes
were agreed upon in the Task Force and not executed, please do point
that out.

-- Kai