W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: Rethinking organization of the mobile-accessibility documents [was: Discussion on purpose of Mobile Accessibility document]

From: Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:04:31 +0100
Message-ID: <79cab0900803270804n6340d9b4pe30b2f6e977946a1@mail.gmail.com>
To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, "MWI BPWG Public" <public-bpwg@w3.org>

On 26/03/2008, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote:
>
>  I think the 3 primary use cases for the documents are (where the "I" could be a developer, manager, policy maker, etc.):
>  1. I know WCAG 1.0 and now I also want to do MWBP.
>  2. I know MWBP, and now I also want to do WCAG 2.0.
>  3. I haven't done much with either accessibility or designing for mobile devices, and now I want to do both.
>
>  Question: How common is #2 - that is, are many people familiar with MWBP?

The difference with #2 is that accessibility is a legal requirement in
many jurisdictions. Maybe mobile-friendliness will be one day, but
*now* most people ought to know about accessibility. We hope that MWBP
will become better known and I'm sure that the BPWG will want to help
with that.

With #3, we shouldn't assume that if people know both, that they won't
neeed any help. It sounds plausible butin practice most people will
need clarification to avoid getting things wrong.

I think that there's scope for a short introductory high-level
document that doesn't actually mention any SCs or BPs except as
examples. Based on the experiences document.

A.


-- 
Alan Chuter,
Senior Web Accessibility Consultant, Technosite (www.technosite.es)
Researcher, Inredis Project (www.inredis.es/)
Email: achuter@technosite.es
Alternative email: achuter.technosite@yahoo.com
Blogs: www.blogger.com/profile/09119760634682340619
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:05:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:05:10 GMT