W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > March 2008

HTTP Link Use cases

From: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:52:46 +0000
Message-ID: <47DE3F6E.9060506@icra.org>
To: Public MWBP <public-bpwg@w3.org>

Jo and I discussed this on the phone the other day so this note is

a) to remind him of that conversation;
b) alert other members of the group to the issue.

We have discussed the potential usefulness of the HTTP Link Header in 
the mobile space in past meetings (I recall doing so most recently at 
TPAC last year). The issue continues to surface and resurface on the 
IETF/W3C HTTP group and has lead to some very recent and extensive 
discussion. Happy Halpin kicked things off this time [1] and this lead 
to mark Nottingham breathing new life into his draft [2]. I chimed in 
with the POWDER use case [3]. In between these are messages from the 
likes of Roy Fielding and Julian Reschke.

The bulk of the discussion centred on the need for/best approach to 
providing an HTTP Profile header, i.e. an extensible and unambiguous way 
to extend relationship types. It's not as easy as it sounds...

If the MWBP in general, and the CTTF in particular, wishes to support 
the reinstatement of HTTP Link and comment on the wider discussion. NOW 
is the time when such an input can have most effect.

Cheers

Phil.


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2008JanMar/0444.html
[2] http://www.mnot.net/drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01.txt
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2008JanMar/0499.html
Received on Monday, 17 March 2008 09:53:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 17 March 2008 09:53:29 GMT