W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > March 2008

RE: BP submission (was: Statistics on mobileOK Basic)

From: Sullivan, Bryan <BS3131@att.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:33:56 -0800
Message-ID: <8080D5B5C113E940BA8A461A91BFFFCD05D94082@BD01MSXMB015.US.Cingular.Net>
To: "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, "Jeff Sonstein" <jeffs@it.rit.edu>
Cc: <public-bpwg@w3.org>

Jeff,
One mail per requirement/BP is recommended, we we can address comments on the list. I will do my best to maitain a summary as we go so the final edits are as close as possible.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dominique Hazael-Massieux
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 9:29 AM
To: Jeff Sonstein
Cc: public-bpwg@w3.org
Subject: BP submission (was: Statistics on mobileOK Basic)


Le mercredi 05 mars 2008 à 12:15 -0500, Jeff Sonstein a écrit :
> Dan Bogaard and I have some BP recommendations to add which I will be 
> typing up tonight and submitting to the list tonight or tomorrow
> 
> question for Dom from the newbie:
> how do you prefer them??
> 
>    - one email with all BP suggestions
>    - one BP suggestion per email
>    - one area-of-practice per email
>       (possibly) containing multiple BP suggestions

I don't have a personal preference (but maybe Bryan, as editor of the BP doc has some?), but I think the one area-of-practice per email approach is probably the most efficient one - it allows one to review the area they are familiar with, while keeping the number of messages to a reasonable level.

Dom
Received on Thursday, 6 March 2008 06:34:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 6 March 2008 06:34:43 GMT