Jo Rabin wrote: [...] > Proposed Text: > > Include a User-Agent header indicating the Default Delivery Context by > sending a product token set to "W3C-mobileOK/DDC-1.0" followed by a > comment set to "(see http://www.w3.org/2006/07/mobileok-ddc)". These may > be followed by any number of other product tokens or comments in > accordance with [HTTP] [Section 14.43, User Agent Header]. The minimal > User Agent header is: > > User-Agent: W3C-mobileOK/DDC-1.0 (see > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/mobileok-ddc) OK, I don't mean to be picky on this, but I probably lost myself in the BNG dicussion. My point is that I thought we agreed that the following was valid: User-Agent: W3C-mobileOK/DDC-1.0 (see http://www.w3.org/2006/07/mobileok-ddc; my comment) -> Based on the proposed text, it's not. Actually, I don't mind either way, with a slight preference for it to be invalid anyway, but I just want to make sure this is what was discussed and agreed. It's good if it's invalid, although I don't quite see in that case why we don't simply state: "Include a User-Agent header indicating the Default Delivery Context by sending a header that starts with: User-Agent: W3C-mobileOK/DDC-1.0 (see http://www.w3.org/2006/07/mobileok-ddc)" But that's probably not rec-friendly enough...Received on Thursday, 5 June 2008 16:11:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 5 June 2008 16:11:56 GMT