W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > February 2008

RE: ACTION-593 Write a summary of preliminary work to be done for this working group to focus on Best Practices for Web applications

From: Sullivan, Bryan <BS3131@att.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:25:00 -0800
Message-ID: <8080D5B5C113E940BA8A461A91BFFFCD05D9400D@BD01MSXMB015.US.Cingular.Net>
To: "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>, "BPWG-Public" <public-bpwg@w3.org>

Thanks, Jo.

Here is my input.

Re "determine what if and what of BP 1.0 needs to be reexamined or built
upon for a generic BP 2.0 document.  I.e. are there gaps left in 1.0
that need closing and will this help us to further improve the creation
of mobile suitable content.": I started that by the text in the
requirements section. Other aspects that need to be carried forward and
improved upon are welcome.

Re "are there any techniques or guidelines to be offered which
belong(ed) more in the realm of mobileOK Pro, which should be addressed
now? Meaning can we, because we are now dealing with more sophisticated
devices, issue new and better BPs?": Some of these (e.g. use of cookies
and redirect) have been proposed in the requirements. I welcome other
aspects as well.

Re "determine which type of device we are writing the BP 2.0 document
for (what are our expections in its capabilities?)": my take is that we
are still talking about mobile devices, mostly at their core intended as
mobile phones, with significant constraints on input/output and
resources in general. I would cut the line at the "micro-PC" (as beyond
the scope), e.g. those devices which are intended to be micro-sized
versions of full desktop/laptop PC's.

Re "determine the scope of BP 2.0.  Where do we not want to go?": There
is some of this in the current draft, but more is welcome.

Best regards,
Bryan Sullivan | AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jo Rabin
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 11:43 AM
To: BPWG-Public
Subject: FW: ACTION-593 Write a summary of preliminary work to be done
for this working group to focus on Best Practices for Web applications


At risk of stoking a fire that already seems to be burning nicely, I am
forwarding this under Bryan's ACTION-660 for the benefit of Trackbot.

Jo



-----Original Message-----
From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich
Sent: 15 February 2008 11:33
To: BPWG-Public
Subject: FW: ACTION-593 Write a summary of preliminary work to be done
for this working group to focus on Best Practices for Web applications


For what it's worth, despite that fact that we had closed this action, I
did find the text which may still have some pertinence.

-- Kai
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 6:50 PM
> To: BPWG
> Subject: ACTION-593 Write a summary of preliminary work to be done for

> this working group to focus on Best Practices for Web applications
> 
> ACTION-593 Write a summary of preliminary work to be done for this 
> working group to focus on Best Practices for Web applications
> 
> For the work done in BPWG under Charter 2 and for BP 2.0 we have 
> determined that the next document will be in the focus of web 
> applications.
> 
> While it is implicit that some ground work has to be done to allow 
> work on web applications to progress, we determined to explicitly put 
> down some of this ground work through this action:
> 
> 
> Things to take care of prior to engaging in web applications related 
> work, in no particular order:
> 
> - determine what if and what of BP 1.0 needs to be reexamined or built

> upon for a generic BP 2.0 document.  I.e. are there gaps left in 1.0 
> that need closing and will this help us to further improve the 
> creation of mobile suitable content.
> 
> - are there any techniques or guidelines to be offered which
> belong(ed) more in the realm of mobileOK Pro, which should be 
> addressed now? Meaning can we, because we are now dealing with more 
> sophisticated devices, issue new and better BPs?
> 
> - determine which type of device we are writing the BP 2.0 document 
> for (what are our expections in its capabilities?)
> 
> - determine the scope of BP 2.0.  Where do we not want to go?
> 
> - formulate specific goals that we wish to achieve with producing this

> document?
> 
> - formulate our expectations as to what should change in public usage 
> of mobile content once we publish this document.
> 
> 
> -- Kai
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 21:25:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:57 UTC