W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > February 2008

RE: Unit of test for MOK Pro

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:31:16 -0000
Message-ID: <C8FFD98530207F40BD8D2CAD608B50B4B87FE9@mtldsvr01.DotMobi.local>
To: "MWI BPWG Public" <public-bpwg@w3.org>



Good point, Alan

Some of the Best Practices refer to sites (e.g. site entry point,
consistent navigation etc.) Nonetheless, I wonder whether it is possible
to still say that the tests refer to a page, and the "site" aspects of
that are considered attributes of the page?

Jo


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of Alan Chuter
> Sent: 08 February 2008 12:38
> To: MWI BPWG Public
> Cc: Charles McCathieNevile
> Subject: Unit of test for MOK Pro
> 
> 
> I understand that the Pro tests will build on the Basic tests. For
> Basic, "The tests apply to a URI." [1]. But for Pro we have begun to
> consider groups of pages, but without saying how the scope of these is
> delimited.
> 
> The WCAG 2.0 draft discusses this under "Understanding 'Web Page'"
> [2]. I believe that WCAG 2.0 avoids cross-page comparisons (please
> correct me if I'm wrong Charles). WCAG 1.0 does consider sets of
> pages.
> 
> regards,
> 
> Alan
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/#applicability
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-
> 20071211/conformance.html#uc-web-page-head
> 
> --
> Alan Chuter,
> Senior Web Accessibility Consultant, Technosite (www.technosite.es)
> Researcher, Inredis Project (www.inredis.es/)
> Email: achuter@technosite.es
> Alternative email: achuter.technosite@yahoo.com
> Blogs: www.blogger.com/profile/09119760634682340619
Received on Monday, 11 February 2008 11:31:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:57 UTC