- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:16:30 +0200
- To: "Miguel Garcia" <miguel.garcia@fundacionctic.org>, public-bpwg@w3.org
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:17:22 +0200, Miguel Garcia
<miguel.garcia@fundacionctic.org> wrote:
...[explanation of why...]
> For an outside viewer mobileOK Basic grammar validity requirement could
> look a bit weird.
Sure. The only sensible explanation is that it takes into account what
works in the real world, rather than trying to require things that don't
matter in practice, and also takes into account the purpose of the
grammar, rather than saying "well, anything is as good as anything else".
The easy way to get this right is to do the right thing. But some wrong
things have no real impact so don't matter. This test is smart enough to
recognise some of that.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
Received on Friday, 18 April 2008 01:17:17 UTC