On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:17:22 +0200, Miguel Garcia <miguel.garcia@fundacionctic.org> wrote: ...[explanation of why...] > For an outside viewer mobileOK Basic grammar validity requirement could > look a bit weird. Sure. The only sensible explanation is that it takes into account what works in the real world, rather than trying to require things that don't matter in practice, and also takes into account the purpose of the grammar, rather than saying "well, anything is as good as anything else". The easy way to get this right is to do the right thing. But some wrong things have no real impact so don't matter. This test is smart enough to recognise some of that. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.comReceived on Friday, 18 April 2008 01:17:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 18 April 2008 01:17:19 GMT