W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Mobile Web BP Accessibility document, Why no correspondence table?

From: David Rooks <drooks@segala.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:46:13 +0000
Message-ID: <57e42cb10711280646l439e5193gf0f40e440fe3737f@mail.gmail.com>
To: "MWI BPWG Public" <public-bpwg@w3.org>, EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
I agree with Miguel on this and resubmit the tables i previously sent to the
mailing list... It still needs some work still but i think its a good
start...

On Nov 28, 2007 1:36 PM, Alan Chuter < achuter@technosite.es> wrote:

>
> On 28/11/2007, Miguel Garcia < miguel.garcia@fundacionctic.org > wrote:
> > ...Also I miss a summaryze table
> > between WCAG and MWBP relationship. This relationship go unnoticed in
> > the chapter among all the text. I'm thinking about making a quick
> > reference guide about how to accesibilize a mobile page. I'll send an
> > example later.
>
> The problem is that there is no easily described relationship between
> the two. Other people have tried to produce tables like this, and the
> MWBP document includes "related to" references but while these are
> useful as shortcuts, they can often be misleading as they don't
> describe what the relationship is.
>
> Perhaps the introduction should make this clear, with a section "Why
> not a WCAG to MWBP correspondence table?". If you think that's a good
> idea, I'll include this in the next draft.
>
> cheers,
>
> Alan
>
>
> --
> Email: achuter@technosite.es
> Blogs
> http://www.blogger.com/profile/09119760634682340619
>
>
>



Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 14:46:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:31 GMT