RE: test against Gmail

> I will push internally to fix
> any issues it identifies in our mobile web-based services

Redirects implemented with meta tags, invalid mark-ups, pictures without
width and height...Sean, I suspect you'll need to do a lot of pushing ;)

Luca

-----Original Message-----
From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Sean Owen
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 5:10 PM
To: Jean-Claude Moissinac
Cc: public-bpwg@w3.org
Subject: Re: test against Gmail


I was going to say that you should pass the URL for Gmail's XHTML
interface to make sure you're checking the right page:

http://validator.w3.org/mobile/?uri=http://mail.google.com/mail/x/

... but I actually get the same result as from checking
gmail.google.com. The checker is checking the desktop version of
Gmail; for some reason Gmail is redirecting the checker's request to
the non-mobile version in both cases. For example, there are many
warnings about using script, but, the mobile web version of Gmail
doesn't use script. I'll see if I can get to the bottom of that.

Once the BPWG's mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 document is finalized, and a
checker is available based on the tests, I will push internally to fix
any issues it identifies in our mobile web-based services.

Sean


On 12/2/06, Jean-Claude Moissinac <moissinac@enst.fr> wrote:
> Hello
>
> For me, gmail is a hit in using mobile web.
> But, when I try
> http://validator.w3.org/mobile/?uri=gmail.google.com
>
> I get a bad result.
> It's confusing me.
>
> A really good application (need to) use very bad practices!
>
> All comments are welcome!
>
> Jean-Claude Moissinac
>
>

Received on Saturday, 2 December 2006 22:40:58 UTC