- From: Andrea Crevola <andrea.crevola@3juice.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 15:18:20 +0200
- To: public-bpwg@w3.org
Rotan Hanrahan wrote: > http://news.bbc.co.uk/detailed/ > http://news.bbc.co.uk/summary/ > http://news.bbc.co.uk/bite-sized/ > http://news.bbc.co.uk/headlines/ > I think that you are right: only two thoughts: 1) following this idea, we need - I suppose - is a sort of standard for naming sub-folders (or sub-domains). One reason for that is avoiding that every webmaster defines his set of *versions*... so our user may find more quickly the version tailored for him. 2) we need a mechanism (technical or logical) that could let the user be aware of the quantity and the quality of information that is behind these urls. At the moment - I think, but that's my opinion - the word "mobile" gives a - rude - idea of the amount of text, images ecc. So, how we can mantain this suggestion using other words? Are these arguments have something to do with best practices in mobile websites? Andrea
Received on Monday, 8 August 2005 13:19:33 UTC