W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-pro@w3.org > June 2008

RE: Feedback to mobileOK Pro?

From: Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich <k.scheppe@telekom.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:21:36 +0200
Message-ID: <398533C370C23441981074C456AA3BDD031DB56C@QEO00226.de.t-online.corp>
To: <public-bpwg-pro@w3.org>

Hi Manrique,

Thanks for your comments...

> Yes and no. I haven't had time to write ordered comments... 

Please make sure to assemble those when you can.

@Everybody else...
Would love to hear from you!



But just a
> brief:
> - AVOID_FREE_TEXT
> If the user is asked to fill in a form and if there is a 
> finite number of possible values that the user could enter 
> and those options are not presented either as a series of 
> radio buttons, check boxes or a select
> menu: [FAIL].
> 
> How many possible values is a 'finite number'?

We didn't limit it, but everything we could think of at least had a
reason for the length of the list.
Most prominent example, a list of countries....long, yes, but desirably
so.


> - BACKGROUND_IMAGE_READABILITY
> - COLOR_CONTRAST
> Isn't the 5:1 contrast ratio related with font size?

No.  It truly measures color values.
While readability may be further diminished by font size it also a best
practice not stipulate font size so that the device may choose the font
appropriate for its display.


> I've been thinking about TESTING, and the idea of defining a 
> 'testing device' for some tests (like PAGE_SIZE_USABLE)...

Good. Please let's hear what you come up with.


> What is the plan for document review?
Well, the plan was to get feedback from the taskforce and then hand it
to the group.
As it stands, you are the only one who has said anything.

 
> What about starting from 1 to N.. and go on???
I am not sure what you mean.



Kai
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2008 16:22:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 4 June 2008 16:22:21 GMT