- From: Tom Hume <Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:51:16 +0000
- To: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>
On 12 Jan 2009, at 23:16, Sean Patterson wrote: > Unambiguously mobile sites should not be transformed by a CT proxy > except: > * in cases where the transformation is needed in order to make the > site > useable and/or display properly on the user's device, or > * if the user has given explicit permission to the CT proxy to apply > transformations to mobile sites. If we're to have any explicit exceptions, I'll put a vote in for their being more specific. IIRC we've already removed language from CTG which referenced terms like "usable" because it wasn't felt to be testable, and therefore left room for ambiguity. As they stand, I think they would permit any proxy to transcode mobile content. After all, would anyone deploy a transcoder with the intention of doing anything other than improving the user experience? -- Future Platforms Ltd e: Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com t: +44 (0) 1273 819038 m: +44 (0) 7971 781422 company: www.futureplatforms.com personal: tomhume.org
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2009 09:52:02 UTC