Just to give some quantitative basis to the discussion on XHTML: the most recent large-scale study of browsing on the Internet is the MAMA project by Opera (many quite interesting reports at section "Opera" of http://dev.opera.com/articles). Here are relevant results. URL analyzed: 3509180 Declared MIME types (percentages of URL): text/html: 3505990 (99,91%) application/xhtml+xml: 935 (0,027%) Out of the URL analyzed, 1788294 had a DOCTYPE (50,96%), thus unambiguously identifying the markup (percentages of DOCTYPES): HTML (2, 3, 3.2, 4.0): 1189097 (66,49%) XHTML (1.0, 1.1, 2): 569283 (31,83%) other: 45046 (2,52%) >From this, one infers a lower bound of 99,84% for the proportion of documents that are unambigously XHTML markup but not advertised as application/xhtml+xml. Sources: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama-basic-document-structure http://devfiles.myopera.com/articles/570/doctype-ci-url.htm http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama-http-headers http://devfiles.myopera.com/articles/554/mamaurlset-mimehistogram.htm E.CasaisReceived on Wednesday, 7 January 2009 22:06:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 January 2009 22:06:44 GMT