W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-ct@w3.org > November 2008

Re: [CTG] Draft 2008-11-07 / cached responses

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:54:54 +0000
Message-ID: <4919566E.3080106@mtld.mobi>
To: casays@yahoo.com
CC: public-bpwg-ct@w3.org

Responses below

On 11/11/2008 09:33, Eduardo Casais wrote:
> a) Paginated responses
> 
> Section 4.1.4 discusses proxies that "paginate responses".
> 
> I am not sure what is meant with "paginated" responses; a
> definition is in order. Is this a reference to range 
> retrieval requests as per RFC2616 14.35.2? Or to splitting
> content for presentation on a mobile device?
> 
The latter, if it's not clear we should make it so.
> 
> b) Stale data
> 
> Proxies "should provide a simple means of retrieving a fresh copy."
> Is there any compelling rationale why they should not? If not,
> then why not put a must?
> 
I don't object to that. I think that once we have the sense straight we 
need to go through the doc adjusting the nuts and bolts. Francois refers 
to such a process under his agenda item 8 in today's agenda

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Nov/0018.html


> 
> E.Casais
> 
> 
>       
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 09:56:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 November 2008 09:56:04 GMT