W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-ct@w3.org > July 2008

ACTION-812 Dig in the archives to check reason not to mention content types in the list of heuristics

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:07:09 +0200
Message-ID: <487DE46D.6090002@w3.org>
To: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>


This is more a reminder than a real action.
We had forgotten why we had decided not to mention any specific 
Content-Type in the list of heuristics (are we getting old?)

I did a quick search this morning:
... based on the now closed ACTION-725 on Sean.

In short, we agreed that Content-Type being a "broken" mechanism in 
practice (text/html vs application/xhtml+xml for instance), and the list 
of the Content-Types we could list being rather short, we would simply 
mention "Content-Type" as a heuristic without explicitly mentioning 
possible values, and rather focus on DOCTYPEs.

I think the mention of the Content-Type application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml in goes in the same direction: "don't add to the mess of 

Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2008 12:07:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:06:29 UTC