W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-ct@w3.org > January 2008

[agenda] CT Teleconference Tuesday 22nd January

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:12:44 +0100
To: public-bpwg-ct@w3.org
Message-Id: <1200928364.6190.74.camel@DOUST-W3CLAPTOP>

Hi all,
Thanks for the new draft, Jo!

Homework:
Tomorrow's teleconf' will mostly be about Jo's latest work on the
Guidelines document [1]. This involves a bit of reading. Please send
comments to the public-bpwg-ct mailing-list before the teleconf' to
raise additional issues.


This is the proposed agenda (my apologies for the agenda arriving so
late):

Chair: Fran├žois
Staff Contact: Fran├žois
Known regrets: none

Date: 2008-01-22T1500Z for 60mn
Phone: +1.617.761.6200, +33.4.89.06.34.99, +44.117.370.6152
Conference code: 2283 ("BCTF") followed by # key
IRC channel: #bpwg on irc.w3.org, port 6665.


Agenda:
1. Hello, I now lead the CT TF
-> Close ACTION-608 on Dan

2. HTTP Cache-Control extensions
- Should we do that? How?
- Any realistic alternatives? Could we make do without it? [ISSUE-227]
[2]
- Which extension values should we use to complete the draft, even
temporarily?
-> Reassign ACTION-603 to fd

3. Requirements (2.1)
- is the part still needed?
-> Close ACTION-604 on Jo

4. Cache-Control: no-transform, and the possible exception of
"dangerous" content (2.4 Proxy States):
- parallels with child protection mechanisms?
- is there a way to precise that?
- shouldn't we simply not mention it if we can't?

5. Content transformation proxies and "non browser" environments [3.2
Proxy Receipt, Forwarding or response to a Request]
- how may a CT-aware proxy detect that a user agent is not a browser
when the client is CT-unaware?
- how can a CT-aware proxy interact with the end-user in a non browser
environment?

6. HTTP Vary: User-Agent directive
- links to Jo's "yet unopened Pandora's box". What should we do in the
common case when the common entry point to a site dispatches via
redirect to a media specific version?

7. Use case analysis (Part 4.)
- We must check that fall-back behavior works in all cases.
- Who's to take care of that part?

8. Roadmap. First Public Working Draft?

9. AOB
- review pending ACTION-606 and ACTION-607 on Heiko
- something else?


References:
[1]
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/080118#CT-Landscape
[2] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/227
Received on Monday, 21 January 2008 15:12:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 21 January 2008 15:12:54 GMT