Re: [ACTION-603] Conversation with Yves, our HTTP expert, about CT and Cache-Control extensions

On Feb 6, 2008 1:47 PM, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote:

>  I think the point is that no-transform is not a new lock.
>
Your previous comment was about adding finer grained bits to no-transform
(which would be new).

No-transform is only applicable if we treat these things as proxies anyway
-- I can argue they are more like user agents of their own, or user agent
extensions, which makes the no-transform not applicable.  It's more like a
text mode browser (which won't adhere to the no-transform).

Aaron