Francois Daoust wrote: > >> Of course, the "unless" clause in CTG makes it easier for Novarra and >> Verizon to justify the abuse, as compared to the Manifesto. > > It does not. > We resolved to add an explicit text in this section that states that > inferring that a desktop User-Agent is needed in the absence of any > indication (e.g. URI patterns) is contrary to the guidelines. Francois, Can I find the text you are referring to somewhere? anyway, my interpretation of your sentence is that, in case of a URI of the form "www.*" it is OK to spoof the UA string. Do I understand correctly? If I understand correctly, I am still inviting W3C to be strong and require that the UA header is never replaced. LucaReceived on Friday, 19 December 2008 18:50:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 19 December 2008 18:50:52 GMT