W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-ct@w3.org > August 2008

Re: [agenda] BPWG Content Transformation Task Force 2008-08-26

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:14:03 +0100
Message-ID: <48B40FAB.7010708@mtld.mobi>
To: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>

I've abandoned today's call - let's all plan to resume next week, that 
is, the next call will be Sept 2 and I will chair it in François's 
absence. Agenda per today's, I'll send out a reminder on Monday.

Jo


On 26/08/2008 10:41, Jo Rabin wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> Sorry to be late to the party, but I am just back from holiday.
> 
> I think it would be a good idea to hold a call at 1400 GMT, 1500 UK, 
> 1600 Europe ... and I am happy to chair it. If this has gone out too 
> late and we don't end up with a quorum then we'll try again next week.
> 
> Cheers
> Jo
> 
> Please note that this meeting is W3C Member Only.
> 
> Chair: Jo
> Team Contact: None
> Known Regrets: Francois, AndrewS
> 
> Agenda:
> 
> 1. Discuss public feedback on CT document last call - see below.
> 
> 2. AOB
> 
> Logistics:
> 
> 
> Date [ISO 8601 style]: 2008-08-26T1400Z
> 
> i.e. 0700 US Pacific, 1000 US Eastern, 1500 UK, Ireland, 1600 CET, 1700 
> Helsinki
> 
> Phone: tel:+16177616200, tel:+33489063499 or tel:+441173706152
> Code 2283 ("BCTF") followed by #
> 
> IRC: irc://irc.w3.org:6665#bpwg
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Status on feedback received on the Content Transformation 
> Guidelines  specification
> Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:59:04 +0000
> Resent-From: public-bpwg-ct@w3.org
> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:00:19 +0200
> From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
> To: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>
> 
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> Many comments received for the Last Call of the Content Transformation
> Guidelines so far, see:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-comments/2008JulSep/
> 
> I registered all the different comments in the Last Call Comments
> Tracker. A view I find much useful is the view of the Annotated Document:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2000/06/webdata/xslt?inclusion=1&xslfile=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2003%2F12%2Fannotea-proxy&xmlfile=http%3A%2F%2Fcgi.w3.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Ftidy-if%3FdocAddr%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.w3.org%252FTR%252F2008%252FWD-ct-guidelines-20080801%252F&annoteaServer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2006%2F02%2Flc-comments-tracker%2F37584%2FWD-ct-guidelines-20080801%2Fannotations 
> 
> 
> Or, more conveniently:
> http://tinyurl.com/634lue
> 
> The view allows one to see easily the parts that were most commented:
> - section 4.1.5 Alteration of HTTP Header Values
> - section 4.1.5.5 Original Headers
> - section 4.2.3.2 Indication of Intended Presentation Media Type of
> Representation
> - section 4.3.6 Proxy Decision to Transform
> - section 4.3.6.2 HTTPS Link Re-writing
> 
> This means we have a bit of work to do. Yes, we need to review the
> comments one by one and address and reply each one of them. Fortunately,
> many comments on the above sections are similar in content. Once we
> agreed on a position, replying should be easy.
> 
> My overall position is that we should keep the Task Force alive for the
> time being. Even though some of the comments may be "merged", there
> still remain a lot of them, so a dedicated hour on this per week seems
> to be a minimum. Besides, the Last Call comments period is not over yet!
> 
> That being said, I unfortunately have to send my regrets for the next 2
> weeks: I'm off next week, and traveling for business the week after.
> 
> Francois.
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2008 14:15:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 26 August 2008 14:15:33 GMT