W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-ct@w3.org > August 2008

[agenda] BPWG Content Transformation Task Force 2008-08-26

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:41:42 +0100
Message-ID: <48B3CFD6.7040201@mtld.mobi>
To: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>


Sorry to be late to the party, but I am just back from holiday.

I think it would be a good idea to hold a call at 1400 GMT, 1500 UK, 
1600 Europe ... and I am happy to chair it. If this has gone out too 
late and we don't end up with a quorum then we'll try again next week.


Please note that this meeting is W3C Member Only.

Chair: Jo
Team Contact: None
Known Regrets: Francois, AndrewS


1. Discuss public feedback on CT document last call - see below.

2. AOB


Date [ISO 8601 style]: 2008-08-26T1400Z

i.e. 0700 US Pacific, 1000 US Eastern, 1500 UK, Ireland, 1600 CET, 1700 

Phone: tel:+16177616200, tel:+33489063499 or tel:+441173706152
Code 2283 ("BCTF") followed by #

IRC: irc://irc.w3.org:6665#bpwg

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Status on feedback received on the Content Transformation 
Guidelines  specification
Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:59:04 +0000
Resent-From: public-bpwg-ct@w3.org
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:00:19 +0200
From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
To: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>

Hi guys,

Many comments received for the Last Call of the Content Transformation
Guidelines so far, see:

I registered all the different comments in the Last Call Comments
Tracker. A view I find much useful is the view of the Annotated Document:


Or, more conveniently:

The view allows one to see easily the parts that were most commented:
- section 4.1.5 Alteration of HTTP Header Values
- section Original Headers
- section Indication of Intended Presentation Media Type of
- section 4.3.6 Proxy Decision to Transform
- section HTTPS Link Re-writing

This means we have a bit of work to do. Yes, we need to review the
comments one by one and address and reply each one of them. Fortunately,
many comments on the above sections are similar in content. Once we
agreed on a position, replying should be easy.

My overall position is that we should keep the Task Force alive for the
time being. Even though some of the comments may be "merged", there
still remain a lot of them, so a dedicated hour on this per week seems
to be a minimum. Besides, the Last Call comments period is not over yet!

That being said, I unfortunately have to send my regrets for the next 2
weeks: I'm off next week, and traveling for business the week after.

Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2008 09:43:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:06:29 UTC