W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-ct@w3.org > April 2008

RE: Normative text in informative "Requirements" section

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 11:55:53 +0100
Message-ID: <C8FFD98530207F40BD8D2CAD608B50B4DEF581@mtldsvr01.DotMobi.local>
To: "Francois Daoust" <fd@w3.org>, "public-bpwg-ct" <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>

You are right of course. I'm actually unsure that there is a requirement to pick out the bits that are not normative, so it might be best just to remove the bits that say "this is / isn't normative". 

Jo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francois Daoust [mailto:fd@w3.org]
> Sent: 08 April 2008 09:35
> To: public-bpwg-ct; Jo Rabin
> Subject: Normative text in informative "Requirements" section
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Re-reading the draft, I noticed the "Requirements" section (3) is
> flagged as "informative".
> 
> But 3.2 contains bolded "should", "may" and "must" key words that
> reference RFC2119 and are normative.
> 
> We should probably flag 3.1 as informative and flag 3.2 as normative.
> 
> PS: Jo, btw, there remains an upper-cased "MAY" in 3.2.3.
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 10:56:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 April 2008 10:56:39 GMT