W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-ct@w3.org > September 2007

FW: ISSUE-217 (Restructure Problem Statement): Should the current Section 2 of the Problem Statement be folded into Section 1 [Content Transformation Problem Statement]

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:16:49 +0100
Message-ID: <C8FFD98530207F40BD8D2CAD608B50B46ABF9B@mtldsvr01.DotMobi.local>
To: <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>

Forwarding to CT list for discussion



-----Original Message-----
From: member-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:member-bpwg-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
Sent: 11 September 2007 17:27
To: member-bpwg@w3.org
Subject: ISSUE-217 (Restructure Problem Statement): Should the current
Section 2 of the Problem Statement be folded into Section 1 [Content
Transformation Problem Statement]



ISSUE-217 (Restructure Problem Statement): Should the current Section 2
of the Problem Statement be folded into Section 1 [Content
Transformation Problem Statement]

http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/

Raised by: Jo Rabin
On product: Content Transformation Problem Statement

Having reworked section 1, section 2 of the problem statement [1] now
looks a little spare or incomplete. One solution might be to fold the
required techniques currently in section 2 into section 1 as highlighted
text. This could make the document easier to read and provide a clearer
rationale for those requirements. It's a relatively small point, but
worth considering for the sake of clarity and readability.

[1]
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Probl
emStatement/070907

This relates to my ACTION-555
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2007 17:17:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:36 GMT