W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-ct@w3.org > October 2007

FW: ISSUE-224 (Sanity Checking): How should we make an assessment of the impact of the various possible guidelines on real web sites [Content Transformation Guidelines]

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:25:42 +0100
Message-ID: <C8FFD98530207F40BD8D2CAD608B50B47D3917@mtldsvr01.DotMobi.local>
To: <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>

Forwarding to ct list for discussion.


-----Original Message-----
From: member-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:member-bpwg-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
Sent: 11 October 2007 09:25
To: member-bpwg@w3.org
Subject: ISSUE-224 (Sanity Checking): How should we make an assessment
of the impact of the various possible guidelines on real web sites
[Content Transformation Guidelines]



ISSUE-224 (Sanity Checking): How should we make an assessment of the
impact of the various possible guidelines on real web sites [Content
Transformation Guidelines]

http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/

Raised by: Jo Rabin
On product: Content Transformation Guidelines

As discussed on Tuesday's CT Call - any suggestion we make as to how to
do content transformation needs to be carefully assessed against the
real world.

We need some kind of infrastructure and test plan.
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2007 08:26:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:36 GMT