W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: transcoders bad

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 18:06:11 -0400
Message-ID: <e920a71c0808051506l5c71f297iaf021c2cbf392451@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Luca Passani" <passani@eunet.no>
Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org, "Terren Suydam" <terren@singleclicksystems.com>

I moved this thread to wmlprogramming, can we continue there? will you
approve my post?

Your comments are well registered, along with those of developers like
me who think you are mistaken in some ways. It doesn't mean it will
change just because you made a comment, and in fact, I don't see much
support here. Assume #2 will happen.

How about leaving this list alone and continuing on wmlprogramming,
your turf? You've said your peace.

On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Luca Passani <passani@eunet.no> wrote:
>
>
> I see two outcomes here:
>
> 1) the working group adopts developers' suggestions (imprimis User-Agent and
> HTTPS preservation), and developers endorse CTGs.
>
> 2) the working group doesn't adopt developers suggestions: I will make sure
> the mobile world knows that CTGs are NOT endorsed by developers and that W3C
> is available to put its stamp on whatever document anyone with enough money
> to seat at the W3C table wants.
>
> Personally, I would much prefer the first outcome.
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2008 22:06:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:50 UTC