W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (I)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:50:52 +0200
Message-ID: <4897255C.9030301@gmx.de>
To: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA <jmcf@tid.es>
CC: "public-bpwg-comments@w3.org" <public-bpwg-comments@w3.org>

JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA wrote:
> ...
> As per RFC 1808 an empty relative URI href="" resolves to complete base URL, so it is suggested to use this mechanism to point to the current resource  
> ...

You really don't want to cite RFC 1808 anymore. It has been obsoleted by 
RFC 3986 over three years ago.

BR, Julian

Received on Monday, 4 August 2008 15:51:36 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA: "RE: [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (I)"
Previous message: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA: "[CT-Guidelines LC] (Editorial) Difficult to understand"
In reply to: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA: "[CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (I)"
Next in thread: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA: "RE: [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (I)"
Reply: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA: "RE: [CT-Guidelines LC] Fragment identifier in link alternate href (I)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 August 2008 15:51:36 GMT