W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: Another comment on the 25 May 2007 mobileOK Basic draft

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:04:33 -0400
Message-ID: <e920a71c0707051404s129ca3bfi8da47e02b7dca6e6@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Koch" <koch@w3development.de>
Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org

I think your reading matches the intent here, yes. All of this would
be considered if www.example.org was being tested. The final 200
result would be treated as the "real" document under test, but the
cost associated with getting there would be accounted for.

Sean

On 7/4/07, Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de> wrote:
>
> Hi BPWG group,
>
> I just came around a situation where some requests were needed to get to
> the final response, e.g. like this:
>
> request 1: http://www.example.org/
> response 1: 401 (needs authentication)
>
> request 2: http://www.example.org/ with authentication
> response 2: 302 to http://www.example.com/
>
> request 3: http://www.example.com/
> response 3: 401 (needs authentication)
>
> request 4: http://www.example.com/ with authentication
> response 4: 200
>
> According to section 2.3.3, responses 1, 3 and 4 should be tested. So
> there is one (primary doc + included resources) to be tested for URI
> http://www.example.org/, but two (primary docs + included resources) to
> be tested for URI http://www.example.com/. Do you distinguish between
> these two? Or do all three belong together?
>
> --
> Johannes Koch
> In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum.
>                              (Te Deum, 4th cent.)
>
>
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 21:04:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 15 June 2012 12:13:31 GMT