W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: mOK response proposal

From: Jon Ribbens <ertwg@sitemorse.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:49:47 +0100
To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070622144947.GU2531@snowy.squish.net>

On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 02:52:41PM +0200, Johannes Koch wrote:
> apart from the GET vs. POST typo issue, Jon mentioned:
> >Well, theoretically since GET is idempotent you can safely try, for
> >example, simply submitting the form with its default values.
> I may have missed it, but does the mobileOK draft describe how to handle 
> GET forms? Only use default values?

It's very vague. 'Use default values' is my own opinion (and is what
we do in the web-checking tool our company provides). Section 2.3.8
might possibly be intended to mean that the URL in the 'action'
attribute should be taken and fetched unchanged with no form parameters
at all, but that would be highly inadvisable (there is essentially no
other circumstance, other than a mobileOK test, where that URL would
be requested).

I feel that clarification of this is quite important.

I have CC'ed this message to public-bpwg-comments, as today is
apparently the last day for comments.
Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 14:50:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:50 UTC