W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:20:01 -0500
To: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Cc: Ben 'Cerbera' Millard <cerbera@projectcerbera.com>, HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>, mobileOK WG <public-bpwg-comments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1181841601.6525.116.camel@pav>

On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 08:47 -0400, Sean Owen wrote:
> [...] It reflects roughly mid-level phones from the past
> 5 years to entry-level phones of today -- what "most" mobile users in
> the world might have available to access the web.

Why the quotes around "most"?

I'd appreciate pointers to any sources of credible statistics.

> cHTML didn't take off? I think Japan begs to differ, and I think it's
> an example of how very limited access can still be useful.

Again, I don't doubt your claims, but I'd find your argument
much stronger if it were backed by credible statistics. And
I'd like to think that the W3C Mobile Web Best Practices
WG includes some people who can speak to these deployment
issues 1st-hand, or at least point to the current

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2007 17:20:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:50 UTC