W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > April to June 2007

MobileOK comments

From: Jon Ribbens <ertwg@sitemorse.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:29:48 +0100
To: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070613182948.GZ2531@snowy.squish.net>

Things I noticed:

| 2.3.8 Visible Linked Resources
| ...
| Note that forms with method get are permissible in documents under
| test, but must not be checked in case posting caused unwanted side
| effects such as the addition of unwanted records to a database.

I think that's probably meant to say 'forms with method *post*'.
Either way, it doesn't make sense in context as-is.

| 3.1 AUTO_REFRESH (partial) and REDIRECTION

This section does not say what to do if no URL is specified in the
meta content. In fact, the "Mobile Web Best Practices" document itself
seems confused as to how the 'refresh' header works. The header
contains a time-delay in seconds, and an optional URL. The "Mobile"
documents seem to think it just contains a URL.

| ...
| If no meta http-equiv  element is present, referring to those
|        headers, FAIL
| warn, and continue the test using the value from the meta content
|        attribute.

The last line above is missing something, probably an "Else," at the

I am not sure that the fact that this section is mandating warnings
whenever content is specified as uncacheable is a good idea. Even if
it is, it should be made explicitly clear that that is the intent
- especially for example on the "Pragma" header, where people might
think that it is the Pragma header itself which is being warned about.

| ...
| HTTP Content-Type headre
|   application/xhtml+xml; charset=UTF-8"

Extraneous " at the end of the line.
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 18:56:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:50 UTC