W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > January to March 2006

[STRUCTURE] - alternative wording?

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:40:25 +0100
To: "public-bpwg-comments@w3.org" <public-bpwg-comments@w3.org>
Cc: "WCAG 2 comments" <public-comments-wcag20@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.s490dnkewxe0ny@pc090.coreteam.oslo.opera.com>

[This is a comment on Mobile Best Practices, but cc'ed to WCAG as a  
comment for them on text the are currently using]

The wording "Ensure that perceivable structures within the content can be  
programatically determined", copied verbatim from the WCAG working draft,  
has proven to be very difficult to understand for the majority of the  
developers I have ased to comment on this draft (which is only a couple of  

Perhaps something more straightforward, like "use markup, properly" is  
simpler for a title, with the current title moved into the "what it means"  
session as a couple of sentences.



Charles McCathieNevile                     chaals@opera.com
   hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
      Peek into the kitchen: http://snapshot.opera.com/
Received on Monday, 20 February 2006 14:40:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:49 UTC