W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: [CONTEXT] is unnecessary

From: <dom@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:05:09 +0000 (GMT)
To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060412170509.7B52E66389@dolph.w3.org>

[Sorry for the duplicate]

  Dear Charles McCathieNevile ,

The Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Mobile Web Best
Practices 1.0 published on 13 January 2006 Thank you for having taken the
time to review the document and to send us comments!

This message holds the disposition of the said comments on which the
Working Group has agreed. This disposition has been implemented in the new
version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060412/

Please review it carefully and let us know if you agree with it or not
before 3 May 2006. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director
during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C
Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group,
Philipp Hoschka
Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux
W3C Staff Contacts

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/op.s490diijwxe0ny@pc090.coreteam.oslo.opera.com
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/


=====

Your comment on [IMAGES_SPECIFY_SIZE...:


The requirement expressed by [CONTEXT] is only necessary for some kinds of
 
sites - it is really a technique that needs to be used to meet some other 

requirements in certain circumstances.

In addition, having it first in the list of best practices suggests that  
there is a huge amount of work to be done in order to deliver any  
worthwhile content to the mobile web that is not required on the web in  
general. This is simply not true as a general statement.

cheers

Chaals


Working Group Resolution:
The group agreed and decided to drop this as a Best Practice.

----
Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2006 17:13:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:50 UTC