W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: [STRUCTURE] - alternative wording?

From: <dom@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:05:09 +0000 (GMT)
To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060412170509.8D0BC6638B@dolph.w3.org>

[Sorry for the duplicate]

  Dear Charles McCathieNevile ,

The Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Mobile Web Best
Practices 1.0 published on 13 January 2006 Thank you for having taken the
time to review the document and to send us comments!

This message holds the disposition of the said comments on which the
Working Group has agreed. This disposition has been implemented in the new
version of the document available at:

Please review it carefully and let us know if you agree with it or not
before 3 May 2006. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director
during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C
Recommendation Track.


For the Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group,
Philipp Hoschka
Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux
W3C Staff Contacts

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/op.s490dnkewxe0ny@pc090.coreteam.oslo.opera.com
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/


Your comment on [STRUCTURE] Ensure t...:

[This is a comment on Mobile Best Practices, but cc'ed to WCAG as a  
comment for them on text the are currently using]

The wording "Ensure that perceivable structures within the content can be 

programatically determined", copied verbatim from the WCAG working draft, 

has proven to be very difficult to understand for the majority of the  
developers I have ased to comment on this draft (which is only a couple of

Perhaps something more straightforward, like "use markup, properly" is  
simpler for a title, with the current title moved into the "what it means"
session as a couple of sentences.



Working Group Resolution:
We have changed the wording to:

"Use features of the markup language to indicate logical document

Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2006 17:13:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:50 UTC