W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: Re:Comments on Draft 13 January 2006

From: <dom@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:05:09 +0000 (GMT)
To: Werner Egipsy Souza <hephail@gmail.com>
Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060412170509.6C64166387@dolph.w3.org>

[Sorry for the duplicate]

  Dear Werner Egipsy Souza ,

The Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Mobile Web Best
Practices 1.0 published on 13 January 2006 Thank you for having taken the
time to review the document and to send us comments!

This message holds the disposition of the said comments on which the
Working Group has agreed. This disposition has been implemented in the new
version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060412/

Please review it carefully and let us know if you agree with it or not
before 3 May 2006. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director
during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C
Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group,
Philipp Hoschka
Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux
W3C Staff Contacts

 1.
http://www.w3.org/mid/e6db80a00602130859p534963eeg4e63cafd73fff9d5@mail.gmail.com
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/


=====

Your comment on 2.6 Device Limitations:
2.6 Device Limitations



The word \"Device Limitations\" is not right,



The main interest here, should be to to first make note of the fact that
the

mobile device, has an evolution which is very isolated from the evolution
of

the PC.



The mobile device was evolved from the Telephone, rather than the Desktop

PC. Hence, the mobile device as it currently exists, is an advancement of

Graham Bell\'s invention, rather than a downgrade of Charles Babbage\'s

invention.



Where it goes, from there, is an advancement to a cornerstone of the

virtual, online, World.



The mobile device is slowly becoming a key component of the wearable

computing phenomena, where multiple devices, will use the mobile device as
a

central point of control and storage.



Hence \"Differences between the mobile device and the computer\" would be
the

right word to use.

Working Group Resolution:
We think that device limitations is the correct way to make the contrast
between the capabilities of a mobile device and those of the desktop, for
an audience that is used to delivering content to desktops.

----

Your comment on 2.7 Advantages:
2.7 Advantages



A point to add:



The mobile is destined to be a universal point of data storage, and

execution, rather than a data creator. This is greatly due to the various

means of device-device communication available to the mobile, such as the

operator network, Wi-fi, Infrared, Bluetooth, audio ports and USB ports.

5.2.6 Access KeysAccess keys, should be made accessible, according to

prevalent usability standards.

One standard, would be that page up and Page Down keys, must be
permanently

hard-coded, to make navigation of a page, less arduous.

One suggested implementation, is to use a slider key for the volume,
during

the phone mode. Then, when the browser is activated, use the same slider
key

as a Page Up-Down key.

Working Group Resolution:
2.7 We're not clear that this is indeed an advantage that is relevant to
this phase of Mobile Web Best Practices.



5.2.6 We think this refers to the User Agent and hence out of scope of
this document.

----
Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2006 17:13:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:49 UTC