W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-access@w3.org > November 2007


From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:12:13 +0100
To: achuter@technosite.es, "Mobile Web Accessibility Task Force" <public-bpwg-access@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t2ih2n0fwxe0ny@widsith.local>

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:59:46 +0200, Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>  

> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>> CMN: No, the working group did consider mobile content although didn't  
>> talk about it a lot. But I think it is true that the requirements are  
>> very closely related.
> I've removed the comment and reworded it like this:
> "Does it give me WCAG 1.0 compliance?: No, but this BP goes some way  
> toward complying with WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 12.3, “Divide large blocks of  
> information into more manageable groups where natural and appropriate”.  
> However the WCAG checkpoint is much broader in scope, covering all usage  
> contexts."

Yes, that looks like a good way of doing it.



Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals              Try the Kestrel - Opera 9.5 alpha
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 17:12:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:32 GMT