Re: The future of our Blockchain community group

note also;
https://blockchain.ieee.org/
http://standards.ieee.org/news/2017/digital_inclusion.html

On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 02:03 Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
wrote:

> do DIDs fit into a broader term that links to blockchain domain-interests
> & expertise?
>
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 01:53 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 9 August 2017 at 17:23, Colleen Kirtland <cskirtland@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Mountie and I discussed today that since the interest in our Community
>>> Group has honestly been very modest, we will send out a brief Survey Monkey
>>> to members to gauge if there is interest in continuing or disbanding. If
>>> there is interest in continuing, clearly the use case effort hasn't really
>>> taken off so we'd like to understand if there is enough momentum on some
>>> other effort we'd like to undertake. Otherwise, Design Thinking approach
>>> would have us conclude that our "customers" (the community) don't find
>>> value in the group, and that in my mind, it's perfectly OK to admit that
>>> and try a new venture! :)
>>>
>>
>>
>> Just following up on this.  How did the survey go?
>>
>> I am still interested in the intersection of the web and blockchains.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Colleen
>>>
>>
>>

Received on Thursday, 19 October 2017 15:10:20 UTC