Re: Graphic Facilitator

"Yes" to poll question.  Let's do it.

   ________________________
   |   Daniel "Dazza" Greenwood <http://dazzagreenwood.com/>
   |   CIVICS.com <http://civics.com/> & Law.MIT.edu <http://law.mit.edu/>
   |   dazza@CIVICS.com & 617.500.3644
   |   Box 425845, Cambridge, MA 02142



On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Bailey Reutzel <baileyreutzel@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I typically find these helpful as well, but I do have some bias as I'm the
> journo in the room and it helps to have some visual representations for
> these digital topics. :)
>
>
>
> Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® 6, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Doug Schepers <doug@schepers.cc>
> Date: 5/13/2016 1:24 PM (GMT-07:00)
> To: Blockchain Workshop <public-blockchain-workshop@w3.org>, Christopher
> Allen <ChristopherA@blockstream.com>
> Subject: Graphic Facilitator
>
> Hi, folks–
>
> Christopher has suggested that we consider having a graphic facilitator
> at the workshop. I see benefits to that, including having concrete
> diagrams, illustrations, and other easily-digested material to help make
> talk about the event after it's happened.
>
> Here's Christopher's summary:
>
> [[
> Graphic Facilitation: No matter the format, I have found it very
> powerful to have professional facilitation on hand. In particular I like
> graphic facilitation. I happen to have a former professional colleague
> Kelvy Bird who does this who lives in Boston. Her professional website
> about these services is at http://www.dpict.info/ and her blog on this
> is at http://www.kelvybird.com/ — she is available for this date […] for
> the two days and a half-day to digitize and report out.
> ]]
>
> Christopher, you also showed me some graphics that came out of one of
> your workshops… could you share those links, and any other thoughts?
>
> I'd like for the PC to come to a fairly prompt agreement on whether we
> want to do this. So, please chime in on with a "yes", "no, and here's
> why", or "neutral".
>
> Thanks!
> Doug
>
>

Received on Friday, 13 May 2016 21:41:56 UTC