W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bioschemas@w3.org > April 2018

Re: Group membership and profile contributions

From: Justin Clark-Casey <justinccdev@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 17:41:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAME9NR8HSQCKDzeOb7TpjoZf6_+wdT5UpU7EkzSnYw=cAfLavA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Gray, Alasdair J G" <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>
Cc: "public-bioschemas@w3.org" <public-bioschemas@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Gray, Alasdair J G <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>
wrote:

> Hi Justin,
>
> On 11 Apr 2018, at 13:06, Justin Clark-Casey <justinccdev@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> However, I feel that it may put people like me, a research software
> engineer who produces Bioschemas consuming components/applications, in a
> less than ideal position.  I've been involved with Bioschemas for a long
> time, but the cross-cutting nature of my work means that my contributions
> to profiles tends to be at the general and technical level.
>
>
> I appreciate your concern here and the contribution of folk like yourself
> are essential to the community and the development of profiles. I believe
> that there could be a case made for your contribution to various profiles
> based on your involvement in discussions both in meetings and online.
>

Thankyou Alasdair.  Yes, I think a case could actually be made for me in
particular and folks like Dominique, but I'm also very interested in
encouraging participation and co-operative development with other software
engineers too, who may not have had those opportunities so far but should
get recognition.

>
> I know there is the validation group [1], but afaik there isn't currently
> a group that covers search issues, such as recommendations for making
> bioschemas markup findable (e.g. reachable through a sitemap, aggregating
> markup on a single page, pushing a crawl to commoncrawl.org) or search
> technology (e.g. Federico and Ricardo's crawler work, and the Buzzbang
> project, components of which were used in the recent EBI Biosamples
> workshop to demonstrate linking data from 2 biobanks).
>
> So as part of a clarification of group membership, I would propose
> creation of a new Technical group to encourage engagement on these topics
> and give recognition to engineers working in this area. I would be happy to
> help lead such a group.  Thoughts from anybody?
>
>
> We certainly need to have something like the technical group that you
> propose. Does such a group need to be separate from the Tools group that is
> developing the profile for describing software tools and services?
>

 I believe it should be separate because describing tools/libraries and
implementing them are activities that often (though not always) draw
different interest groups.


> Hopefully we can start populating something like the GSoC page with tools
> that we have available for the community to use. The page could list tools
> such as BuzzBang and explain how others can contribute.
>

That would be a great start, since such a page could also point towards
current and evolving technical best practice surrounding bioschemas (e.g.
where to put markup, sitemap.xml, etc.).


> What do others think?
>
> Alasdair
>
> Alasdair J G Gray
> Fellow of the Higher Education Academy
> Assistant Professor in Computer Science,
> School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
> (Athena SWAN Bronze Award)
> Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh UK.
>
> Email: A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk
> Web: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~ajg33
> ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5711-4872
> Office: Earl Mountbatten Building 1.39
> Twitter: @gray_alasdair
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Heriot-Watt University is The Times & The Sunday Times International
> University of the Year 2018*
>
> Founded in 1821, Heriot-Watt is a leader in ideas and solutions. With
> campuses and students across the entire globe we span the world, delivering
> innovation and educational excellence in business, engineering, design and
> the physical, social and life sciences.
>
> This email is generated from the Heriot-Watt University Group, which
> includes:
>
>    1. Heriot-Watt University, a Scottish charity registered under number
>    SC000278
>    2. Edinburgh Business School a Charity Registered in Scotland,
>    SC026900. Edinburgh Business School is a company limited by guarantee,
>    registered in Scotland with registered number SC173556 and registered
>    office at Heriot-Watt University Finance Office, Riccarton, Currie,
>    Midlothian, EH14 4AS
>    3. Heriot- Watt Services Limited (Oriam), Scotland's national
>    performance centre for sport. Heriot-Watt Services Limited is a private
>    limited company registered is Scotland with registered number SC271030 and
>    registered office at Research & Enterprise Services Heriot-Watt University,
>    Riccarton, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS.
>
> The contents (including any attachments) are confidential. If you are not
> the intended recipient of this e-mail, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or use of its contents is strictly prohibited, and you should
> please notify the sender immediately and then delete it (including any
> attachments) from your system.
>
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2018 16:41:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 12 April 2018 16:41:31 UTC