- From: ljgarcia <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 02:35:59 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: susheel.varma@elixir-europe.org, Dan Bolser <dan.bolser@gmail.com>, public-bioschemas@w3.org
Hi Dan, all, thanks for the links. I will take a look and will see how to move to more domain specific hasPart/isPartOf. Regards, On 2017-09-12 17:50, Dan Brickley wrote: > On 12 September 2017 at 17:34, Susheel Varma > <susheel.varma@elixir-europe.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Leyla - Are you suggesting to move schema.org [1] CreativeWork [2] >> properties (hasPart [3], isPartOf [4]) to its more generic parent >> Thing [5]? Any particular reason why? > > Historically we have always resisted attempts at generalising > hasPart/isPartOf to non-document notions of part, but see > https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1097#issuecomment-209014851 > for some of that discussion and suggested way forward. > > For isBasedOn / isBasisFor - I had a feeling we'd done it already. > There was a proposal as part of the legislation documentation effort, > https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1156 ... I'm just asking > there what became of that proposal, > https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1156#issuecomment-328914376 > > >> Best wishes >> ยง Susheel >> >> On 12 September 2017 at 15:09, Dan Bolser <dan.bolser@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> I would suggest making a pull request against >> https://github.com/BioSchemas and initiating the discussion (which I >> think you just did ;-) >> >> Not sure which repo to edit. >> >> Can you motivate the changes? >> >> On 12 September 2017 at 06:14, ljgarcia <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk> wrote: >> Hi Dan, >> >> We would like to propose moving hasPart/isPartOf from CreativeWork >> to Thing. We would also like to propose a reverse property for >> isBasedOn (it would be isBasisFor) that would go to CreativeWork. >> >> What would be the right way to do so? Should we include a schema for >> Thing and CreativeWork including those changes? And they, if >> approved, would be later merged? >> >> Regards, > > > > Links: > ------ > [1] http://schema.org > [2] http://schema.org/CreativeWork > [3] http://schema.org/hasPart > [4] http://schema.org/isPartOf > [5] http://schema.org/Thing
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2017 01:36:25 UTC