Re: radical as a new default branch

> On 22 Feb 2015, at 16:17, Alexandre Bertails <alexandre@bertails.org> wrote:
> 
> The plan of action is:
> 
> * `radical` becomes `series/0.8.x`
> * `series/0.8.x` is made the default branch
> * `radical` is removed
> * `master` becomes `series/0.7.x`
> * `master` is removed
> 
> I can do that today but I want to make sure that everybody is ok with
> the fact that the existing PRs will have to be reissued. So I am
> especially waiting for Allistair's approval who has a bunch of them.

fine

> 
> Alexandre
> 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Anton Kulaga <antonkulaga@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Henry, thank for clarification. I want to speed up the decision process as
>> having clear branch structure is important for getting more contributors
>> 
>> 2015-02-20 15:50 GMT+02:00 henry.story@bblfish.net
>> <henry.story@bblfish.net>:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 20 Feb 2015, at 12:50, Anton Kulaga <antonkulaga@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> some time ago we had a hangout (with Alexander, InTheNow, bblfish and me)
>>> where we decided that it would be nice to turn "radical branch" into 0.8.x
>>> series and make it a default branch while current master should become 0.7.x
>>> series.  Is there anybody who
>>> 
>>> objects?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> to be precise, the idea was to call the radical branch series/0.8
>>> and the current master series/0.7
>>> And in effect not to have a master.
>>> 
>>> Henry
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Anton Kulaga
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Social Web Architect
>>> http://bblfish.net/
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Anton Kulaga

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/

Received on Sunday, 22 February 2015 15:23:52 UTC