W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-awwsw@w3.org > September 2012

Re: AWWSW final report...

From: Jonathan A Rees <rees@mumble.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:38:25 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGnGFMJa0m3bk9NMAKVfRNytU0VBWZ_kRMqwQGP+=m9WxMH_BA@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Cc: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:03 AM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 07:27 -0400, Jonathan A Rees wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:37 PM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:
>> > I suggest presenting to the TAG both the report that you drafted and the
>> > earlier AWWSW Final Report that we drafted on the wiki at
>> > http://www.w3.org/wiki/AwwswFinalReport
>> > I have already linked your draft report from that wiki page; it would be
>> > good if you would similarly link that page from your draft report.
>>
>> OK, I guess this is the best we can do, so I'll proceed in this way,
>> attributing my report to me and the one on the wiki to you. Can you
>> change the "draft" indicator on the wiki page to a statement that it
>> is your report, not a group product, to avoid confusion?
>
> Well, it isn't exactly *my* report, as we both created that page
> collaboratively: you first drafted it, and then I reorganized, edited
> and added links.  It was intended to be a joint report, and I expected
> it to go through more edit cycles with you and others, but that did not
> happen.  I would have written it substantially differently if I had set
> out to write my own personal report.

Please feel free to turn it into something you'd be happy giving to
the TAG as reflective of your own perspective.
Jonathan

> Anyway, I've removed the "DRAFT" indicator, and added its authorship
> ("Initial draft by Jonathan Rees (through 12-Nov-2011) <br>
> Substantially reorganized and edited by David Booth").
>
>>
>> I will be revising mine a bit. When I'm ready to forward it to the
>> TAG, I'll link to the wiki page version that is current at that time
>> so that the TAG has a stable reference.
>>
>> Would anyone else on this list care to provide their own report?
>
> I'll think about it, and write something up if I have time.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> David Booth, Ph.D.
> http://dbooth.org/
>
> Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
> reflect those of his employer.
>
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2012 14:38:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 18 September 2012 14:38:52 GMT