W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-awwsw@w3.org > October 2011

Re: AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-10-25

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:45:23 -0400
To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Cc: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, nathan@webr3.org, AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1319460323.2178.84858.camel@dbooth-laptop>
What input do you suggest giving to the TAG?

David

On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 09:31 +0100, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
> Jonathan,
> 
> Thanks for all the hard work you put in here ... +1 to close and  
> hopefully get some input to TAG.
> 
> Cheers,
> 	Michael
> --
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> Ireland, Europe
> Tel. +353 91 495730
> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
> http://sw-app.org/about.html
> 
> On 22 Oct 2011, at 02:15, Jonathan Rees wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
> >> I trust your judgement and will +1 whatever you think is best.
> >
> > Often I don't discover what I think until it comes out of my mouth.
> > That's why I find telcons and meetings helpful.
> >
> >> The documents produced are very good and in my mind, nice and  
> >> clear. My only
> >> concern is with being GET 200 specific, so I'd be happy to have a  
> >> final
> >> drive through to the end of the year to try to make it method, and
> >> potentially protocol, agnostic advise. If anybody else is up for it.
> >
> > Well I don't consider "retrieval" to be tied to GET 200 or even to
> > HTTP, and I have recently been always generalizing from GET/200 to
> > retrieval (a word used in RFC 3986).
> >
> > But your point is well taken and I haven't thought about it enough.
> > E.g. we have the analogous situation with using mailto: URIs to
> > 'identify' people, which you're not supposed to do but which someone
> > might be inclined to do. And I have been steadily worried about POST
> > in relation to HR14a.
> >
> > Best
> > Jonathan
> >
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Nathan
> >>
> >> Jonathan Rees wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Quorum is 3.
> >>>
> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>> From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
> >>> Date: Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:34 PM
> >>> Subject: AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-09-27
> >>> To: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
> >>>
> >>> Agenda:
> >>> We need to just declare victory and shut the group down.
> >>> It's clear that given the low level of interest we're not going to
> >>> solve any more problems so let's just figure out what to report to  
> >>> the
> >>> TAG.
> >>>
> >>> Jonathan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
David Booth, Ph.D.
http://dbooth.org/

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of his employer.
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 12:45:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 24 October 2011 12:45:49 GMT