W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-awwsw@w3.org > October 2011

Re: AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-10-25

From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:31:11 +0100
Cc: nathan@webr3.org, AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
Message-Id: <B51093DA-DE03-4FDB-87D9-0B7A249CD3CE@deri.org>
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>

Jonathan,

Thanks for all the hard work you put in here ... +1 to close and  
hopefully get some input to TAG.

Cheers,
	Michael
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html

On 22 Oct 2011, at 02:15, Jonathan Rees wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
>> I trust your judgement and will +1 whatever you think is best.
>
> Often I don't discover what I think until it comes out of my mouth.
> That's why I find telcons and meetings helpful.
>
>> The documents produced are very good and in my mind, nice and  
>> clear. My only
>> concern is with being GET 200 specific, so I'd be happy to have a  
>> final
>> drive through to the end of the year to try to make it method, and
>> potentially protocol, agnostic advise. If anybody else is up for it.
>
> Well I don't consider "retrieval" to be tied to GET 200 or even to
> HTTP, and I have recently been always generalizing from GET/200 to
> retrieval (a word used in RFC 3986).
>
> But your point is well taken and I haven't thought about it enough.
> E.g. we have the analogous situation with using mailto: URIs to
> 'identify' people, which you're not supposed to do but which someone
> might be inclined to do. And I have been steadily worried about POST
> in relation to HR14a.
>
> Best
> Jonathan
>
>> Best,
>>
>> Nathan
>>
>> Jonathan Rees wrote:
>>>
>>> Quorum is 3.
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
>>> Date: Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:34 PM
>>> Subject: AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-09-27
>>> To: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
>>>
>>> Agenda:
>>> We need to just declare victory and shut the group down.
>>> It's clear that given the low level of interest we're not going to
>>> solve any more problems so let's just figure out what to report to  
>>> the
>>> TAG.
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 08:32:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 24 October 2011 08:32:07 GMT