Re: Graphs / IRs / Blank Nodes - related strand

See attachment

Seems a bit unfortunate that they're taking the upper right route,
while we're taking the lower left, but so it goes.

If they're claiming the G-SNAP is an IR... well it's not clearly in
agreement with TimBL.  I'm not sure I care as there is no way to tell
the difference, as far as I can tell - the two boxes are isomorphic,
and the diagram commutes.

Jonathan

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
> FYI, a conversation Pat and I have been having on the RDF WG
>
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Mar/0114.html
>
> there's a lot more context, but that's about the top and bottom of it, named
> graph (named g-box) that changes over time ("IR" then), blank node
> identifiers scoped to the name where one exists, and where not then just to
> the serialized rdf as per usual.
>
> Nathan
>