W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-awwsw@w3.org > January 2011

[Fwd: Re: What triple does an HTTP see Other imply?]

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:26:30 -0500
To: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1295011590.2068.535.camel@dbooth-laptop>
FYI, from the LOD list:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2011Jan/0107.html 

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Christopher Gutteridge <cjg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: <public-lod@w3.org> <public-lod@w3.org>
Subject: Re: What triple does an HTTP see Other imply?
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:05:57 +0000

Sorry, not 301, I meant 303.

Christopher Gutteridge wrote:
> (related to seeAlso discussion) If I resolve a URI /foo and it gives a 
> 301 seeOther to /bar then I should be able to infer a triple from 
> that, I think?
> At the very least, /foo rdfs:seeAlso /bar .
>
> Resolvable URIs are a cool hack, but I think the system would make 
> more sense if they were an alternate way of writing something you 
> could express directly as triples. It feels like that's missing from 
> the stack.
>


-- 
David Booth, Ph.D.
http://dbooth.org/

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of his employer.
Received on Friday, 14 January 2011 13:26:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 14 January 2011 13:26:59 GMT